What Successes & Failures have there been?
.

Home ] Up ] What is a Weed? ] What are the World's Worst Weeds? ] What Problems do Weeds Cause? ] What is Weed Biocontrol? ] Which are the Most Active Countries in Weed Biocontrol? ] What are the Earliest Examples of Weed Biocontrol? ] How Many Weed Biocontrol Projects have been Developed? ] How has Host Testing Changed Over Time? ] What Changes Have Occurred in Host Plant Lists? ] Are Pathogens Suitable Weed Biocontrol Agents? ] Can Other Organisms be Used for Weed Biocontrol? ] What is the History of Legal Controls on Importation? ] What are the Alternatives to Biocontrol? ] What is Integrated Weed Management? ] What is Successful Biocontrol? ] [ What Successes & Failures have there been? ] What Factors Affect Success and Failure? ] How can Success be Improved? ]

The rate of success of projects aiming to achieve biological control is high considering the checks and constraints placed on biological control. The global success rates for classical biological control of weeds, estimated by Julien et al. (1984), using releases of agents from the first deliberate introduction to 1980 (Julien 1982), were as follows:

Of 174 projects 39% were successful.

101 species of weeds were targeted of which 48% were controlled.

178 different species of organisms were released of which 71% established and 34% were effective.

There were a total of 499 releases of control agents of which 64% established and 29% were involved in successful control of a weed.

Three factors were identified as positively affecting the rate:

Organisations such as CSIRO and the Hawaiian Department of Agriculture, where detailed studies are conducted, had the highest rates of success. In comparison organisations or regions where mainly ad hoc releases have been made, had the highest failure rates.

Utilisation of agents already proven successful in another country provided the best chance for successful control. Repeated use of proven agents is increasing as more countries increase their involvement in biological control. For example, the salvinia weevil, initially successful in Australia, was subsequently released and controlled salvinia in 13 other countries.

Utilisation of native organisms to control weeds showed a far greater success rate, 62% of releases, compared to 28% for exotic organisms. These results should be treated cautiously because of biases in the comparison. The main limitation to using native organisms is that an ongoing commitment to rearing and making inundative releases is required.

One of the difficult aspects of assessing biological control is defining and describing success or failure. Outcomes of biotic interactions over the range in which the organisms (weed and agents) exist are usually variable hence describing the results can be complex. Determining what effects the success of a project, and improving the overall (global) rates of success are considered elsewhere.

Back ] Next ]

Mic Julien