What Changes Have Occurred in Host Plant Lists?
.

Home ] Up ] What is a Weed? ] What are the World's Worst Weeds? ] What Problems do Weeds Cause? ] What is Weed Biocontrol? ] Which are the Most Active Countries in Weed Biocontrol? ] What are the Earliest Examples of Weed Biocontrol? ] How Many Weed Biocontrol Projects have been Developed? ] How has Host Testing Changed Over Time? ] [ What Changes Have Occurred in Host Plant Lists? ] Are Pathogens Suitable Weed Biocontrol Agents? ] Can Other Organisms be Used for Weed Biocontrol? ] What is the History of Legal Controls on Importation? ] What are the Alternatives to Biocontrol? ] What is Integrated Weed Management? ] What is Successful Biocontrol? ] What Successes & Failures have there been? ] What Factors Affect Success and Failure? ] How can Success be Improved? ]


Checking for damage during a host-specificity test.

Initially, only plants of economic importance were tested. Test lists included many plants quite unrelated to the host weed, and which were most unlikely to be attacked. In 1968, Harris and Zwolfer (1968) proposed that testing should concentrate on plants related to the known host, and should aim to determine the range of plants acceptable to the insect rather than demonstrate that certain valued plants were immune to attack. This approach was seen to be sensible, and test lists progressively changed to focussed lists of plants botanically or chemically related to the host weed.

The next major change was the growing concern over environmental issues, and possible damage to native plants, and from the 1980s these began to be included in test lists. In many cases, this has led to conflict over whether feeding on native plants of no economic significance is a sufficient reason to block release of a potentially valuable agent of a major agricultural or environmental weed. Discussion on these issues continues (McEvoy 1996; McFadyen 1998).

Back ] Next ]

Rachel McFadyen and Brian Willson