What are the Earliest Examples of Weed Biocontrol?
.

Home ] Up ] What is a Weed? ] What are the World's Worst Weeds? ] What Problems do Weeds Cause? ] What is Weed Biocontrol? ] Which are the Most Active Countries in Weed Biocontrol? ] [ What are the Earliest Examples of Weed Biocontrol? ] How Many Weed Biocontrol Projects have been Developed? ] How has Host Testing Changed Over Time? ] What Changes Have Occurred in Host Plant Lists? ] Are Pathogens Suitable Weed Biocontrol Agents? ] Can Other Organisms be Used for Weed Biocontrol? ] What is the History of Legal Controls on Importation? ] What are the Alternatives to Biocontrol? ] What is Integrated Weed Management? ] What is Successful Biocontrol? ] What Successes & Failures have there been? ] What Factors Affect Success and Failure? ] How can Success be Improved? ]


A pink-flowered form of Lantana camara.

The earliest intentional biological control of a weed was the use of the cochineal mealybug Dactylopius ceylonicus against the cactus Opuntia vulgaris in southern India in 1863 and in Sri Lanka in 1865 (Tryon 1910). Cochineals were used in several countries to produce a red dye, but this was the first time they were used to control their host cactus, which had become a weed.

The first significant program of classical biological control, involving the import of agents following a search in the country of origin of the weed, was the program against Lantana camara in Hawaii. In 1902, the entomologist Koebele, who had previously been responsible for the successful control of cottony cushion scale Icerya purchasi on citrus in California, was employed to search for insects attacking lantana in its native range in Mexico. Twenty three different insect species from Mexico were shipped to Hawaii, of which 14 were released and eight of these established to give adequate control of lantana in most areas (Waterhouse and Norris 1987).

The next major program was the successful control of the prickly pears (Opuntia species) in Australia (Dodd 1940). Huge areas of valuable land were being progressively overrun by prickly pears, introduced to grow cochineal and as hedges or drought fodder. In 1912, two scientists were sent overseas to search for control agents and five agents were introduced between 1913 and 1914. The cochineal Dactylopius ceylonicus successfully controlled the drooping tree pear, Opuntia vulgaris, but the other major pear, Opuntia stricta, continued to spread.




A young prickly pear plant (Opuntia stricta)

In 1920, the Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board was set up, with the sole aim of attempting to control the prickly pears biologically. The Board Headquarters were in Brisbane, in a converted house at the site of the Alan Fletcher Research Station. Entomologists were based for several years in Mexico and the southern USA, where the cactus originated, and in Argentina where other related prickly pears occurred. A total of 48 different insect species were imported for testing in Brisbane, 12 of which were released and established. The most important was the moth Cactoblastis cactorum, introduced from Argentina in 1925. At the time, 60 million acres (24 million hectares) of valuable land had been infested by the cactus. By 1933, only a few years after the first release of the cactoblastis moth, the last big cactus areas had been destroyed. Ever since, the cactus continues to be controlled by the moth, with only occasional small outbreaks due to unusually dry weather which favours the cactus over the moth. These are controlled as soon as wetter summers return.

The enormous success of the prickly pear program led to requests for the moth from other countries, and cactoblastis was introduced to South Africa and the West Indies, as well as other smaller countries. In nearly all areas, the moth established easily and rapidly controlled the pest cacti, though it is more successful against some species than others. In the West Indies, the moth was first introduced in the 1960s, and spread slowly north and west until in 1989 it was found in Florida in the mainland USA (Bennett and Habeck 1996; Pemberton 1995). Here it threatens native cacti and is regarded as a serious pest. It can be expected to continue spreading into Mexico and the western USA.

Back ] Next ]

Rachel McFadyen and Brian Willson